ࡱ> npm _bjbj rWQQQQQe)))))<e1*/*/*/*/* + + +;1=1=1=1=1=1=12,5=1Q + + + ++=1.QQ/*/*R1...+Q/*Q/*;1. +;1..0hQQ/1)+1/1 h10115.5 /1.Q/1 + + +eed)ee) :    ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION ASSESSMENT PLAN Mission: The mission of the Elliott School of Communication is to develop well-rounded communication professionals with essential skillsincluding an ability to think critically, plan strategically, and communicate effectively in multiple communication contexts (w HYPERLINK http://ww.wichita.edu/esc) ww.wichita.edu/esc). The mission of this comprehensive and integrated degree program is rooted in the fundamental communication artswriting, speaking, and visual communicationand the new convergence of communication forms, channels and technologies that characterize the digital age in which we live. Specifically, the Elliott School seeks to: Deliver a cutting-edge, integrated communication curriculum Contribute to the liberal arts educational of all university students Promote scholarly research and achievements by the faculty and students Provide leadership and assistance to the communication community The mission is built upon the belief that communication specialists should also be communication generalists; and that all communication professionals are engaged in essentially the same functions: gathering information and creating and disseminating messages. This comprehensive communication program departs from the disciplinary divide found at other schools by consolidating degree programs in journalism, speech communication and radio-television-film. The mission of the Elliott School of Communication is consistent with and central to the mission of ڶ to offer programs of teaching, research and service that are responsive to the needs of the metropolitan community that the University serves. The university seeks to equip both students and the larger community with the educational and cultural tools they need to thrive in a complex world, and to achieve both individual responsibility in their own lives and effective citizenship in the local, national, and global community. Program Goals & Objectives See the attached Elliott School of Communication Goals and Objectives for Assessment in the Major(1991 document) wherein 4 goals and several corresponding objectives are outlined. This remains the guiding assessment document for the ESC. In short, the program aims to: #1 To provide students with a broad knowledge of communication through an integrated communication curriculum #2 To prepare students for proficiency in at least one emphasis area of communication: integrated marketing communication, broadcast journalism, print journalism, strategic communication, or electronic media. #3 To provide students with learning experiences from professional resources in the communication industry. #4 To prepare students for professional careers in their chosen area of communication. Expected Learner Outcomes See the ESCs attached assessment plan (first articulated in 1991) in terms of specific objectives that implicate learner outcomes clearly and consistently. Upon completion of the degree requirements for a Bachelor of Arts in Communication, students will be able to: #1 Show proficiency in the fundamental communication artswriting, speaking, and visual communication #2 Be prepared to pursue professional careers in communication in their chosen area of interest #3 Supplement the classroom experience with relevant communication training. This includes: internships (Co-op and others), communication clubs (Lambda Pi Eta, PRSSA, SPJ, AdClub), experiential learning (Live TV News, Speech & Debate, The Sunflower Ad Federation Competition), networking with area professionals, and other communication work paid and unpaid (communication and media industry jobs). #4 Demonstrate competencies in communication across contexts by understanding how theory, research problem-solving, law & ethics apply across fields. Assessment Tools: The following assessment tools are used by the Elliott School of Communication to assess its program goals and learner outcomes: Senior Exit Survey. All seniors must complete an exit survey that assesses their satisfaction with the curriculum instruction, advising, and other opportunities for intellectual growth in the major. (See attached). This survey measures satisfaction levels with all program goals and learner outcomes. Senior Portfolio . All seniors must complete Comm 472 (1credit) Portfolio. (See attached syllabus) In that class all students must submit a portfolio of their work that is then judged by outside evaluators (communication professionals who volunteer their time) with a standard criteria guide (see attached). The best senior portfolios are honored at Awards Night each May. This assessment instrument measures program goals #2, 3, and 4 and learner outcomes #1, 2. Senior Exit Exam. All seniors must complete an exit exam in critical thinking related to the upper division core of courses in Comm 472 Portfolio class. A critical thinking exercise is administered in 472 and a sample is graded on a Likert scale by a team of portfolio instructors. See Comm 472 syllabus for when in the semester this is administered (Begin implementation, Spring 05; Attachment forthcoming). This assessment instrument measures program goal #1 and learner outcome #4 specifically. Alumni Survey. The Elliott School sends out survey questionnaires periodically to its alumni to judge the more long-term effects of the degree on students career development and vocational pursuits. (See attached, but revised and updated alumni survey forthcoming, Spring 05). The survey instrument is constructed to align with all program goals, but specifically the last goal and learner outcome 2. Results: Senior Exit Survey. Since we just implemented this assessment measure last year (Fall 03-Spring 04), we have just one years data (two semesters). But it is compiled. The ESC hired a graduate student working with a lead faculty member to collate the data and analyze the results (available upon request) last year. Senior Portfolio Evaluation Instrument. Five faculty who teach the Comm 472 class in any given semester work directly with all seniors in the class and assess each individual project. They also coordinate the feedback from area professionals. Currently, we are working on a way to better preserve the rating sheets of individual students while preserving anonymity so that composite results can be better known. No cost at this point. Senior Exit Exam. This is a new assessment instrument that will not be ready until Spring 05. Scores from the random sampling of exams will remain on file in the ESC. The exam is administered every spring and fall. Alumni Survey. A full-blown alumni survey has not been conducted since 1999. Approximately every five years an alumni survey is conducted. (Results of the 1999 survey are available upon request). Feedback Loop: Senior Exit Survey. Faculty were exposed to the first senior exit survey results in a detailed report unveiled at the ESC faculty retreat in early September 2004. (Results available upon request.) Senior Portfolio Evaluation Instrument. Faculty who teach the course in any given semester (and all full-time faculty in the ESC rotate through this class) see all the professional feedback sheets. One faculty meeting a year is generally spent on the issue of portfolio evaluation. Awards Night is the opportunity for all faculty, students, staff to see the highest quality portfolios in each emphasis area. Senior Exit Exam. Faculty will be completing construction of the SEE for implementation in spring 05. Like the scores of the Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation Test (GSP) administered to all students as an entry level admission standard to the school, these scores will be kept in a department data base and shared with ESC faculty at their annual retreat. (Results available upon request.) Alumni Survey. The alumni survey results were part of the ESC Program Review that all ESC faculty members received in 1999. All ESC faculty have results of that survey. Faculty would continue to be apprised of these results in the years when a survey is conducted. (Results available upon request.) ASSESSMENT PLAN ORAL COMMUNICATION PROGRAM COMMUNICATION 111, PUBLIC SPEAKING (A Required Basic Skills Course of the ڶ General Education Program) Submitted by THE ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION FAIRMOUNT COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY Mission: The mission of the Oral Communication Program at ڶ is to develop in students essential speech competencies for functioning effectively in the classroom, in vocational pursuits, and in participation in society as an enlightened, articulate citizens(Comm 111 Handbook, 2002). The mission of the Comm 111 Public Speaking course is tied directly to the ڶ mission. [T]he University seeks to equip both students and the larger community with the educational and cultural tools they need to thrive in a complex world, and to achieve both individual responsibility in their own lives and effective citizenship in the local, national, and global community(ڶ mission statement, adopted 1991). It is also tied directly to the goals of the ڶ General Education Program and K-12 Kansas state mandates for communication proficiency. The mission is built upon the belief that instruction in speech is central to understanding who we are as symbol users; appreciating the diverse ways in which speech forms communities; and sharpening our moral sensibilities regarding the power of speech in affecting societal values. The ability to speak effectively and ethically has been recognized as the hallmark of an educated person since the beginning of recorded history. Preparation for life in the modern world requires communication with a cross section of diverse people who often have conflicting needs and interests. Effective speech helps maintain a sense of community and craft consensus in an increasingly diverse and complex world. An oral communication course brings together students from across the institution and provides direct experience in communication within a diverse speech community. Program Objectives: See the Communication 111 Handbook wherein 4 objectives are outlined. This handbook remains the guiding assessment document for the program. In short, the program aims are fourfold: #1 Students should demonstrate basic oral communication skills necessary for functioning effectively in the classroom, in vocational pursuits, and in participation in society as an enlightened, articulate citizen. #2 Students should gain a greater appreciation for the complexities of the oral communication process by recognizing the important variables in the speaker-audience situation and learning basic strategies for tailoring messages to overcome potential obstacles in the speaking situation. #3 Students should develop critical thinking skills by recognizing the rhetorical techniques used by others to influence them, and by learning active listening skills. #4 Students should maximize opportunities for leadership potential that emerge in formal speaking situations by overcoming speech anxiety, projecting expertise, trustworthiness, and dynamism and showing genuine regard for the audience. Expected Learner Outcomes The specific objectives of the course are tied to specific learner outcomes clearly and consistently. Upon completion of the course, students will: #1 Show proficiencies in the fundamental building blocks of the speech communication process. #2 Demonstrate competence in the development and delivery of original speeches that meet specific purposes for communicating effectively and ethically in different contexts. #3 Receive uniform instruction and systematic evaluation on the craft and critique of public speaking performances. #4 Evaluate critically their own and others speech communication competencies. Assessment Tools: The following tools have been (or will be) used by the Oral Communication Program to assess Communication 111 program objectives and learner outcomes: Systematic & Uniform Instructor Training. Each August the Elliott School of Communication offers Communication 750c, a three-credit course designed to prepare new Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) and others to teach Communication 111, Public Speaking. The course is required of those teaching Comm 111. Lecturers must have a masters in communication, or a closely related field, and experience teaching public speaking. Because Comm 111 is part of ڶs General Education Program, every effort is made in Comm 750c to standardize the way the course is taught in an effort to ensure that students taking Comm 111 have comparable experiences across sections. (See Comm 750c Syllabus.) To that end, all Comm 111 instructors are required to use the same textbook, Steve Lucas (2004) 8th ed. The art of public speaking, New York: McGraw-Hill. The text is the most widely adopted public speaking textbook in the United States. In addition, a specially compiled Communication 111 Handbook, which contains the common syllabus, course objectives, course policies and all speech evaluation forms, is required. A Curriculum Guide (attached) contains detailed instructions for assignments, exercises, speeches and chapter readings for each week. During the Comm 750c course, students receive instruction on how to use the textbook, accompanying Instructors Manual, Curriculum Guide and the Comm 111 Handbook to manage the course effectively. In addition, instructors are carefully trained to evaluate speeches by reviewing dozens of videotaped student speeches using the approved evaluation forms under the direction and mentoring of the Basic Course Director. Weekly GTA staff meetings are held during the semester to continue training and to provide a standardized approach in effective grading of speech performances. In addition, all GTAs teaching Comm 111 are evaluated through a class visitation by the Basic Course Director, or the Assistant Basic Course Director in the fall semester. During the spring semester, peer visitations are conducted. After each visitation, GTAs are provided with a standardized evaluation form where the evaluators observations and suggestions are noted. Further, all instructors of Comm 111 must use SPTE. This assessment tool facilitates program objectives #1-4 and all learner outcomes, and measures learner outcome #3 specifically. Comprehensive Final Examination. The Communication 111 program (35-40 sections of up to 26 students per section each semester) administers a comprehensive and objective Final Examination of 100 questions based entirely on the course textbook. The exam is composed from a random sample of normed test bank questions. The exam is scored by the social science research lab. This assessment instrument seeks to assess competence in meetings program objectives #2, and #3 specifically and learner outcome #1 directly. Self- Report Survey of Speech Competencies. Beginning this semester (Fall 2004), the oral communication program is administering a pilot pre and post-test survey (see attached) to Comm 111 students. The survey is designed to assess students perceptions toward public speaking fundamentals and their self assessments of their own oral competence and confidence before taking the course and upon completion of the course. The survey instrument is constructed to align with program objectives #2 and #4, and measure learner outcome #4 specifically. Policy Persuasive Speech Evaluation. Since the policy speech represents the culmination of learning the speech communication process and is the final speech in the course, this speech is the best indicator of students competency in achieving performance based course objectives. The program has not, heretofore, archived scores on the Policy Persuasive Speech. Beginning this semester (Fall 2004), the program will begin tracking these scores. Given that the evaluation tool for this performance is standardized and all those teaching the course have received training in how to utilize the tool consistently, the cumulative grade for this speech will be recorded for assessment purposes. The Policy Persuasive Speech grade is an indicator of a students competency in achieving course objective #1 and #4 and measuring learner outcomes #1, #2 and #3 specifically. Other Assessment Activities: Shocker Speak-Out Tournament. Each semester, the Oral Communication Program conducts a culminating speech tournament (Shocker Speak-Out) involving the top-rated student on the policy speech of each section of Communication 111. On study day, each sections top speaker competes in a policy speech semi-final round in Elliott Hall composed of three judges from the Comm 111 program (instructors cannot judge their own students). From that semi-final round, 6-7 finalists emerge. All Comm 111 students are encouraged to attend and critique the final round of the tournament in Hubbard Hall. University faculty and staff and citizens from the community serve as judges for the final round. The Media Resource Center tapes the event. VHS tapes of every final round of the Shocker Speak-Out Tournament have been archived since 1995. An event like this showcases the best policy speakers in the program and the tapes serve as instructional videos for classroom purposes in preparation for the policy speech. Results: Systematic & Uniform Instructor Training. The Comm 750c course has been offered every summer for nearly twenty years. The course is taught by the Basic Course Director. In the Elliott School of Communication, three faculty have served in this capacity. Course evaluations are required. The course has been used as a model in presentations at the National Communication Associations annual conventions. The course requires constant updating related to emerging communication pedagogy and instructional resources. Course syllabi, sample work, course evaluations are available upon request. Related to the systematic training of instructors, the program has tracked average GPAs across sections since the fall of 1998. Results show little variance. Comprehensive Final Exam. The program has been collecting final exam scores for some time. The average score on the final exam is 73 correct out of 100 possible. Each question is worth one point. Given this score, the program remains confident that the Comm 111 Final Exam is successfully assessing course objectives #2 and #3. Self-Report Survey of Speech Competencies. This survey is being implemented for the first time in the fall of 2004. Yearly results will be collected and assessed. Policy Persuasive Speech Evaluation. The speech grade for the policy speech is being collected for the first time in the fall of 2004. Yearly results will be collected and assessed. Feedback Loop: Systematic & Uniform Instructor Training.. Faculty who teach this course include course materials and SPTEs as part of their annual Faculty Activity Record. GTAs in the program evaluate the program formally (course and program evaluation) and informally (weekly training sessions). The Basic Course Policy Committee, a standing committee in the Elliott School comprised of five faculty who teach in the program, examines this training course for updates. Course materials are available to the General Education assessment committee. Comprehensive Final Examination.. All instructors of Comm 111 receive a printout of the cumulative final exam scores along with their section scores for comparison purposes. The Basic Course Policy Committee examines these scores regularly. This committee also reviews textbooks for possible adoption. Final exam scores are available to the General Education assessment committee. Self-Report Survey of Speech Competencies. The results of this survey will be made available to all instructors of Comm 111. The basic course policy committee will examine the survey instrument and assess pre/post test results. The self-report survey will be available to the General Education assessment committee. Policy Persuasive Speech Evaluation. The results of the policy speech grade will be made available to all instructors of Comm 111. The basic course policy committee will examine speech scores. The persuasive speech evaluation instrument and cumulative scores will be available to the General Education assessment committee. Supplemental Information Communication 111 Test-out option Students who believe they have acquired a sufficient level of expertise in public speaking, may apply for the test-out option. The first step is to sit for the Communication 111 Final Exam. Should the student earn a score of at least 70 out of 100 possible on the Final Exam, they may then deliver a Policy Persuasive Speech to a panel of communication faculty. Should their speech be judged at the 70% or above level, then they have achieved success on the test-out process and are exempted from Communication 111. Honors Communication 111 For members of the Emory Lindquist Honors Program, a 4 credit honors section of Communication 111 is offered each semester. It is limited to 17 students. The honors section moves at a more aggressive pace, uses a more advanced text, requires reading primary sources, includes more frequent speech performances, and places more emphasis on becoming accomplished rhetorical critics (students must analyze the rhetoric of well-known American orators). Non-native Speakers of English A section of Communication 111 for non-native speakers of English is also offered every semester. One instructor, whose specialty is in intercultural communication teaches this course. Students with Disabilities For students who can demonstrate a documented disability, which could prevent them from performing well in Communication 111, the Basic Course Director writes a letter of support to their college Admissions and Exceptions Committee supporting their petition to be exempted from the course. In this case, an alternative communication course (usually Communicaiton 190Introduction to Human Communicationa General Education Introductory course) is recommended, which does not include public speaking. 35>> ? e f g z { xE:&'Ep#!3!! """##1%A%&&'''(((()//66I7q7[:]:b:|: @]@_@@@BBBB4DDDDfGHVH#LYLLL+M h6AUH* h6AU6 h6AU0Jjh6AUUjh6AUUh6AU h6AU5S#345>?~   H  & F$a$c4 !v  '(1o#! & F & F & F#!!""""#1%&'''''''''(;(((((((((($a$())* *],^,////00e12,3444445444(55L6666 & F & F66H7I79#<=d> @@BDHHH6H7H#L$L-L.LOOiPjP & F h^h` hh^h`h hh^h`h & F+M.MMM2N4NO8OjPP Q1QQRSToUUVV^_h6AU h6AU5jP QQQQQQQQQQQQQSoUVWW X X,X-X2Z3ZLZMZ\\2\2\3\\\ ] ]^_/ =!"#$%DyK ww.wichita.edu/esc)yK 6http://ww.wichita.edu/esc)666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH 8`8 Normal_HmH sH tH 8@8  Heading 1$@&5>@>  Heading 2$$@&a$5DA`D Default Paragraph FontZiZ  Table Normal :V 4 l4a _H(k (No List 0U@0 Hyperlink>*B*DC@D Body Text Indent `PK!K[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;BQޏaLSWyҟ^@ Lz]__CdR{`L=r85v&mQ뉑8ICX=H"Z=&JCjwA`.Â?U~YkG/̷x3%o3t\&@w!H'"v0PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlYOoE#F{o'NDuر i-q;N3' G$$DAč*iEP~wq4;{o?g^;N:$BR64Mvsi-@R4Œ mUb V*XX! cyg$w.Q "@oWL8*Bycjđ0蠦r,[LC9VbX*x_yuoBL͐u_. DKfN1엓:+ۥ~`jn[Zp֖zg,tV@bW/Oټl6Ws[R?S֒7 _כ[֪7 _w]ŌShN'^Bxk_[dC]zOլ\K=.:@MgdCf/o\ycB95B24S CEL|gO'sקo>W=n#p̰ZN|ӪV:8z1f؃k;ڇcp7#z8]Y / \{t\}}spķ=ʠoRVL3N(B<|ݥuK>P.EMLhɦM .co;əmr"*0#̡=6Kր0i1;$P0!YݩjbiXJB5IgAФ޲a6{P g֢)҉-Ìq8RmcWyXg/u]6Q_Ê5H Z2PU]Ǽ"GGFbCSOD%,p 6ޚwq̲R_gJS֣9)嗛(:/ak;6j11太x~<:ɮ>O&kNa4dht\?J&l O٠NRpwhpse)tp)af] 27n}mk]\S,+a2g^Az )˙>E G鿰L7)'PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!K[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 1_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] Wr#345>?~Hc 4  ! v  '(1o#1 ; !!" "]$^$''''((e)*,+,,,4,5,,,(--L.....H/I/1#45d6 88:<@@@6@7@#D$D-D.DGGiHjH IIIIIIIIIIIIIKoMNOO P P,P-P2R3RLRMRTT2T3TTT U UVW000000000000000 0 0 0 0000000000 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 000000 000000 0 0 00000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000+M_06#!(6jP2\_1234578>fzWX8@0(  B S  ?WW " #'' 0 00 11u6y6c7g799BJGJyJ}JgVtVWc f h 7 9 v \1DE#4v|_1BC5=Dbx"z"~"#(-)-7--1^2`2|222 88,88999:.DWDDDDDEE.EG8G9GjHHHI2I3IIJJJJyJJVK]KKKLLLoMMMNNN-P5PPMRRRRRWSbSTTTTTW::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::w  : {G ].p C^z hh^h`CJOJQJo(qhh^h`CJOJQJo(qhh^h`CJOJQJo(qhh^h`CJOJQJo(qhh^h`CJOJQJo(qC^z].p:{Gw W@WP@UnknownGTimes New Roman5Symbol3 Arial;Wingdings"qhǂFǂF;F G$D24dX?6AU0ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATIONjulia Administrator       Oh+'0   @ L X dpx' ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATIONjulia Normal.dotmAdministrator2Microsoft Word 12.1.1@F#@Xh @*z@*z G ՜.+,D՜.+,L hp|  ' $X  ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION Title 8@ _PID_HLINKS'Apt8http://ww.wichita.edu/esc)Pz  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789;<=>?@ACDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\^_`abcdfghijkloRoot Entry FTqData :1TableB5WordDocumentrSummaryInformation(]DocumentSummaryInformation8eCompObj`ObjectPool;T;T F Microsoft Word 97-2004 DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8